Olivas Ávila, José AlonsoMarquez Rios, Adan Alexis2025-12-082025-12-082025-02https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11961/7053radicionalmente, el estudio del síndrome de burnout en el país se ha enfocado en médicos, personal de enfermería y docentes, sin embargo, se ha encontrado que este síndrome prevalece en al menos el 30% de los mandos medios y superiores de la industria maquiladora, a pesar de esto, sigue siendo necesario mejorar los diseños de investigación e intervención en este ámbito (Camacho Alamilla et al., 2015). En el contexto laboral, es importante saber que dependiendo del número de trabajadores las empresas solo están obligadas a la evaluación del entorno laboral y a la prevención de los factores de riesgo psicosocial como lo es el síndrome de burnout (Cázares, 2020) por lo que resulta necesario implementar intervenciones para disminuir la presencia de estos riesgos, sobre todo en aquellos trabajadores vulnerables a este síndrome. Por lo que las empresas no deben limitarse a realizar una evaluación, sino que es necesario intervenir para darle una solución adecuada y evitar en medida de lo posible las afectaciones al personal, especialmente con las grandes empresas.Burnout syndrome is defined as a psychological syndrome involving a prolonged response to chronic interpersonal stressors at work. The three key dimensions of this response are emotional exhaustion, feelings of cynicism, and detachment from work. The objective was to implement an adaptation of the integrative model of emotional regulation program for the management of burnout syndrome in supervisors in the manufacturing industry. A quasi-experimental design was used with a single pretest-posttest intervention group in a program of 11 sessions in total. The participants consisted of eight production supervisors, five men and three women, whose ages ranged from 27 to 47 years, with a mean of 36.7 years (SD=7.44). The instruments used was the Maslach Burnout Inventory MBI-GS with an α=0.75 for Latin America and α=0.60 for Mexico and the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale DERS with an α=0.91. In the results of the sample, no statistically significant differences was identified before and after the intervention, the following was found in the dimensions of burnout syndrome: Emotional Exhaustion (p=.394), Depersonalization (p=.833) and Personal Achievement (p=.343). In the comparison of groups by shift, a statistically significant difference (p=.024) and a large effect size (r=0.79) is observed in the post-test in the personal achievement dimension between the morning shift and the afternoon shift. It is concluded with a conservation of the null hypothesis since statistically significant changes was only found in the Personal Achievement dimension in the afternoon shift group with respect to the morning shift group.PDFspaCC0 1.0 UniversalSiondrome de bormoutagotamiento emocionaldespersonalizaciónrealización personalindustria manufacturerainfo:eu-repo/classification/cti/5Tesis maestríaCiencias Sociales